Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)9.4/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)9.6/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.6/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.0/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 9.2/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)9.0/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.2/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.8/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.8/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.7/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)9.2/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.6/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.0/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.8/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.9/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)9.0/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.8/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.4/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.4/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.8/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)9.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)9.4/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.6/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)9.4/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 9.5/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.8/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)10.0/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.8/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)6.8/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.4/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
7Sage (LSAT)Editor Choice (LSAT)
LSAT Prep
Best ValueTop Practice BankMost Full-LengthsHighest Rated
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)8.8/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)9.0/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.2/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)9.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 9.2/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)8.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.0/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.6/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.8/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.6/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)8.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)6.6/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.0/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.2/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)6.0/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.4/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)7.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.5/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.8/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)7.8/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)9.4/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.2/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.2/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
OAT BootcampMost Guided Structure
OAT Prep
Top Practice Bank
8.6/10
11,000+ Qs
10 Full Practice Tests
Extension only
$699
$599
Pro 90 days: $599 (reg. $699) · Plus 180 days: $999 (reg. $1,299)
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)8.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.4/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.6/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.4/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 8.6/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.8/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)6.8/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.4/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)8.0/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.7/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.6/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)6.8/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)8.4/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)7.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.6/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.4/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)9.4/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)7.0/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)5.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.4/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.2/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)9.4/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)7.6/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)5.2/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.3/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
Practice quality and exam alignment; estimated from course facts without a published rubric
Platform UX (20%)7.8/10
Interface and workflow; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Value for Money (20%)8.6/10
Price and guarantee policies
Content Coverage (20%)7.2/10
Teaching and depth; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Analytics (20%)6.6/10
Diagnostic tools; estimated from student rating without a published rubric
Overall 7.5/10: the simple average of five criteria. Published editorial scores are used where available; otherwise criteria are estimated from course facts. How we score
